首页> 外文OA文献 >Dependence of gene-by-environment interactions (GxE) on scaling:Comparing the use of sum scores, transformed sum scores and IRT scores for the phenotype in tests of GxE interaction
【2h】

Dependence of gene-by-environment interactions (GxE) on scaling:Comparing the use of sum scores, transformed sum scores and IRT scores for the phenotype in tests of GxE interaction

机译:基于环境的相互作用(GxE)对比例的依赖性:比较GxE相互作用测试中总和得分,转换总和得分和表型IRT得分的使用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Estimates of gene-environment interactions (GxE) in behavior genetic models depend on how a phenotype is scaled. Inappropriately scaled phenotypes result in biased estimates of GxE and cansometimes even suggest GxE in the direction opposite to its true direction. Previously proposed solutions are mathematically complex, computationally demanding and may prove impractical for thesubstantive researcher. We, therefore, evaluated two simple-to-use alternatives: 1) straightforward non-linear transformation of sum scores and 2) factor scores from an appropriate item response theory(IRT) model. Within Purcell’s (2002) GxM framework, both alternatives provided less biased parameter estimates, and improved false and true positive rates than using a raw sum score. Theseapproaches are, therefore, recommended over using raw sum scores in tests of GxE. Circumstances under which IRT factor scores versus transformed sum scores should be preferred are discussed.
机译:行为遗传模型中基因与环境相互作用(GxE)的估计取决于表型的缩放方式。不适当缩放的表型会导致对GxE的估计偏差,有时甚至会建议GxE处于与真实方向相反的方向。先前提出的解决方案在数学上是复杂的,在计算上是苛刻的,并且对于实际研究者可能被证明是不切实际的。因此,我们评估了两个易于使用的替代方法:1)总和评分的直接非线性转换,以及2)来自适当项目响应理论(IRT)模型的因子评分。在Purcell(2002)的GxM框架中,与使用原始总和得分相比,这两种选择都可以减少参数估计的偏差,并提高假阳性率和真阳性率。因此,建议不要在GxE测试中使用原始总和分数来推荐这些方法。讨论了应优先考虑IRT因子评分与转换总和评分的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号